Language may not be so hierarchical after all: A new study challenges 70 years of linguistic theory

Also this week: Some dogs learn words like children + “How to kill a language”, a new book by Sophia Smith Galer

Language may not be so hierarchical after all: A new study challenges 70 years of linguistic theory

Welcome to this week’s edition of Discovery Digest, a weekly roundup of the latest language-related news, research in linguistics, interesting reads from the week, and newest books and other media dealing with language and linguistics!

🆕 New from Linguistic Discovery

This week’s content from Linguistic Discovery.

Why is February spelled with two ⟨r⟩’s?

The word "February" in pink serif text on a light textured background with a pink conversation heart in the lower left corner

Hint: It’s not because English speakers originally pronounced it that way!

Find out more in this free issue of the newsletter:

Why is “February” spelled with two ⟨r⟩’s?
Why is “February” spelled with two ⟨r⟩’s even though most people only pronounce one of them?

Why do people use baby talk? The science of baby talk, Part 2

A baby wearing glasses sits holding a colorful book, with scattered alphabet letters floating around their head

What is baby talk, and why do parents use it in the first place? Does it really have a role to play in a child’s language acquisition, or is it nothing but useless cutesy word play?

Learn all about the surprisingly sophisticated strategies and tactics that caregivers use to make their speech more accessible to their children in this second issue of my special series on the science of baby talk:

Why do people use baby talk? The science of baby talk, Part 2
How caregivers instinctively simplify their speech for children—and how it helps

Here’s the entire series:

ℹ️ Articles in this Series

🗞️ Current Linguistics

Recently published research in linguistics.

Some dogs can pick up hundreds of words—do they learn like children?

A border collie facing the camera against a yellow background

A new study finds that certain exceptional dogs, called “gifted word learners”, may have learned the names of objects (like a squirrel) merely from overhearing their owners talking. Interestingly, this ability doesn’t seem to be breed-specific. The study used an approach designed to study how well human toddlers understand words, but applied it to dogs. They found that the dogs in the study were able to learn words through overhearing just like 1.5-year-old children—and sometimes even better!

Some dogs can pick up hundreds of words – do they learn like children?
Some dogs can remember the names of hundreds of objects.

Language may not be so hierarchical after all

Noam Chomsky popularized a highly formalized, highly mathematized model of language in the 1960s which assumes that language is fundamentally hierarchical—that is, tree-like, as in the following diagram.

A syntax tree diagram showing the hierarchical structure of the sentence "The small dog ran quickly home to his owner." The tree has labeled nodes including CP (Complementizer Phrase) at the top, branching down through TP (Tense Phrase) to NP (Noun Phrase) containing "The small dog" and VP (Verb Phrase) containing "ran quickly home to his owner," with further branches showing the grammatical relationships between words and phrases.

This approach predicts that when people construct sentences in their heads as they’re speaking, they’re not merely thinking about the next word in the sentence, but rather building an entire complex hierarchy, and paying attention to the relationships between each of words and phrases and their constituents. However, humans are capable of recognizing simple linear patterns too, so it’s not strictly necessary to assume that all language is hierarchical. Instead, it may be that people construct sentences more like assembling a puzzle, where pieces of different templates fit into each other, like the image below.

Two diagrams illustrating a non-hierarchical, template-based approach to language structure. Diagram (a) shows three boxes: "On the top" and "the tallest mountain" with dotted lines connecting down to a shared template box labeled "top of the". Diagram (b) shows an abstract version with "NOUN" and "DETERMINER" boxes connected by dotted lines to a template box below labeled "NOUN PREPOSITION DETERMINER", demonstrating how linguistic units fit together like puzzle pieces rather than hierarchically.

A new study uses a set of experiments to show that this non-hierarchical approach to language structure may in fact be more realistic than traditional hierarchical ones.

Evidence for the representation of non-hierarchical structures in language - Nature Human Behaviour
Language is often thought to be represented through hierarchically structured units. Nielsen and Christiansen find that non-hierarchical structures are present across reaction-time tasks, eye-tracked reading and natural conversation.

📃 This Week’s Reads

Interesting articles I’ve come across this week.

The roots of writing lie in hopes and dreams, not in accounting | Aeon Essays
Was writing invented for accounting and administration or did it evolve from religious movements, sorcery and dreams?
    • For my own take on this topic, check out this article on the origins of writing:
From counting to cuneiform: How writing was invented
The earliest version of cuneiform wasn’t used to write language at all—it was used to count! And that Sumerian system of counting still influences our counting systems today. Here’s the story of Sumerian numerals.
The 3,000-year-old story hidden in the @ sign
In Taiwan they call @ “little mouse”. It’s “strudel” in Hebrew, “dog” in Russian and “monkey’s tail” in Dutch. The @ sign is a mirror, and its story goes back thousands of years.
    • In Taiwan they call @ “little mouse”. It's “dog” in Russian, “strudel” in Hebrew and “monkey’s tail” in Dutch. The @ sign is a mirror, and its story goes back thousands of years.
Why people fail at learning languages
And how you can do it better in 2026
Greek, the Asian and African Language
Greek’s place in the story of European language is well known, but its part in the linguistic history of Asia and Africa is just as impressive.
    • Greek's place in the story of European language is well known, but its role in the linguistic history of Asia and Africa is just as impressive.
The 6-7 craze offered a brief window into the hidden world of children
From Pig Latin to Punch Buggy, kids have long used nonsensical language, gestures and games to carve out cultures of their own.

📚 Books & Media

New (and old) books and media touching on language and linguistics.

The language of liars

Book cover for "The Language of Liars" by S.L. Huang. The title and author name appear in yellow text against a dark background featuring colorful octopus tentacles in turquoise, purple, gray, and orange radiating outward. At the bottom, a tagline reads "Can words burn down an empire?”
Amazon | Bookshop.org
Speak another people’s language. Know them. Become them. And discover you’ve destroyed them.

A forthcoming sci-fi book is causing some buzz among language nerds: The language of liars, by S.L. Huang. One reviewer says, “Pitch-perfect science fiction about linguistics and consequences. This book destroyed me.” It’s also been selected as a New Scientist Best of 2026 Pick and a Most Anticipated Pick for Library Hub, Book Riot, and Shelf Reflection. The book has definitely piqued my interest, so I might try to get an advance reviewer copy and let you know what I think.

How to kill a language: Power, resistance, and the race to save our words

Book cover for "How to Kill a Language: Power, Resistance, and the Race to Save Our Words" by Sophia Smith Galer. The title and author name appear in large orange-red text against a cream background, with the subtitle in smaller black text between them.
Amazon | Bookshop.org

A forthcoming book from UK journalist and fellow content creator Sophia Smith Galer looks and how languages are lost and what happens when they disappear:

An urgent, globe-spanning exploration of languages at risk, from Kichwa to Ukrainian, that asks: What do we lose—culturally, politically, and personally—when a language is silenced?

Languages can be killed in many ways: war, the climate crisis, nationalism, and even quiet choices made at the dinner table. Around the world, an unprecedented shift is drawing speakers toward national and global lingua francas. For some, that means losing the language of parents or grandparents; for many, it is a permanent farewell to systems that carry knowledge, culture, and belonging. With half of our 7,000 languages due to disappear this century, linguicide is one of the most pressing cultural emergencies of our age.

In How to Kill a Language, journalist Sophia Smith Galer travels across continents and generations to chart this phenomenon. In Ecuador, she sees firsthand how shame deters parents from passing Kichwa onto their children. In Oman, she learns about languages with roots older than Arabic but never officially recognized. And in Italy, she searches for her Nonna’s dialect, which is vanishing from diaspora communities and Italy itself. But languages can also be reclaimed: We meet the Karuk tribe of California, pioneering a grassroots language immersion program, and the storytellers challenging the criminalization of Kurdish. And in her discussion of Hebrew, Smith Galer reckons with the unintended consequences of raising a language seemingly from the grave.

Part investigation, part travelogue from a disappearing world, How to Kill a Language exposes the true costs of this mass extinction event. Brought to life by vivid storytelling and Smith Galer’s own experience with language loss, it’s a fierce rallying cry for a multilingual future.

👋🏼 Till next week!

Here’s another fun etymological diagram from Starkey Comics, this time some surprising doublets! Did you know that merry, brief, embrace, brace, bra, and pretzel are all related? Read the blog post here for details.

An etymology diagram from Starkey Comics showing how the English words 'merry', 'brief', 'embrace', 'brace', 'bra', and 'pretzel' share a common Proto-Indo-European root mréǵʰus meaning "short, brief". The diagram uses a color-coded flowchart structure to trace the words through different language families: the Germanic branch (in pink/red) shows the evolution from Proto-Germanic murguz through Old English myrge to modern English "merry" and "brief"; the Italic/Romance branch (in blue) traces from Proto-Italic breɣʷis through Latin bracchium ("arm") to Old French brace and embracier, eventually yielding English "embrace" and "brace" as well as French brassière (shortened to "bra"); and a German dialectal branch shows the path to "Pretzel" (from Old High German brezitella meaning "pastry shaped like folded arms"). The diagram also shows the Greek branch through Proto-Hellenic brokʰús and Ancient Greek brakhús meaning "short".
📚
The Amazon and Bookshop.org links on this site are affiliate links, which means that I earn a small commission from Amazon for purchases made through them (at no extra cost to you).

If you’d like to support Linguistic Discovery, purchasing through these links is a great way to do so! I greatly appreciate your support!

Check out my Amazon storefront here.
Check out my Bookshop storefront here.